Kedudukan Taksonomi Bloom Menurut Perspektif Islam
Total Views: 2926
| 
Total Downloads: 1982
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33102/jqss.vol2no1.8Keywords:
Taksonomi Bloom, Kemahiran Berfikir, al-Quran, IslamAbstract
Bloom’s Taxonomy known as a hierarchical framework of learning objective that is used by teachers to measure students’ higher order thinking skills based on questions in learning. There are three domain on Bloom taxonomy which is cognitive (intellectual skill), affective (generic skill) and psychomotor (practical skill). The cognitive domain of Bloom consists of six level organized in a hierarchy from lower until higher level which includes remembering, understanding, application, analysis, evaluation and creating. Since it is introduce by Benjamin Bloom in year 1956, studies have shown there are numerous Western studies have been discusess the strengths and weaknesses of Bloom Taxonomy. However, what is the position of Bloom's Taxonomy according to the Islamic perspectives? Therefore, this paper will concentrate on the criticisms by Western and Islamic perspective against Bloom’s Taxonomy. This study will be conducted using qualitative method by analysing data with descriptive method. The findings show there are criticisms and improvements in the past studies that focus on Bloom's taxonomy into four themes: (1) hierarchical structure, (2) classification structure, (3) uses and (4) new taxonomy requirements to fit the new skills required by the 21st century learning. Indeed, this article can provides a catalyst for further exploration of Islamic influence in education.
Abstrak
Taksonomi Bloom merupakan objektif pendidikan yang digunakan oleh pendidik untuk mengukur dan meningkatkan kemahiran berfikir aras tinggi pelajar dalam pembelajaran. Terdapat tiga domain utama yang perlu dicapai iaitu kognitif (kemahiran intelektual), afektif (kemahiran generik) dan psikomotor (kemahiran praktikal teknikal). Malahan, domain ini diklasifikasikan mengikut enam aras berbentuk piramid yang disusun dari aras rendah hingga ke aras tinggi. Ia merangkumi aras pengetahuan, pemahaman, aplikasi, analisis, sintesis dan penilaian. Sejak ia diperkenalkan oleh Benjamin Bloom pada tahun 1956, terdapat pelbagai kajian Barat yang membincangkan tentang kekuatan dan kelemahan Taksonomi Bloom. Namun, bagaimana pula kedudukan Taksonomi Bloom menurut perspektif Islam? Oleh itu, artikel ini membincangkan kritikan Barat dan pandangan Islam terhadap taksonomi Bloom. Kajian ini menggunakan kaedah kualitatif di mana data akan dianalisis melalui kaedah deskriptif. Hasil kajian mendapati terdapat kritikan dan penambaikan dari kajian lepas yang menfokuskan taksonomi Bloom kepada empat tema: (1) susunan hierarki, (2) pengelasan struktur, (3) kegunaan dan (4) keperluan kepada taksonomi yang baru sesuai dengan arus pembelajaran abad ke 21. Kajian ini juga dilihat sebagai pemangkin awal bagi meluaskan bidang pengukuran Islam dalam sistem pendidikan di Malaysia.
References
Abdal-Qasim Mahmud ibn Muhammad ibn ‘Umar al-Zamakhsyari. (2010). Al-Kasyyaf ‘an Haqaiq At-Tanzil wa uyun al-Aqawil fi wujuh at-Ta’wil. Darul Kitab al-Arabi Beirut.
Abdullah, Abdul Rahman. (1995). Al-Alamiyyat al-'Aqliyyah fi al-Quran al-Karim wa Dalalatuhaal-Tarbawiyyah. Majallah Jamiat al-Malik Sa'ud li al-Ulum al-Tarbawiyyah wa al-Dirasat al-Islamiyyah. (7)1. 105129.
Al-Ghazali.(1986). Ihya’ al-Ulum al-Din.Lubnan: Dar al-Kutub al-Ilmiyyah.Amer, A. (2006). Reflections on Blooms Revised Taxonomy. Electronic Journal of Research in Educational Psychology.V4. page:213–230.
Amirault, R. J. (2015). Technology Transience And The Challenges It Poses To Higher Education. The Quarterly Review of Distance Education.16(1), 11–24.
Anderson, L. W., &Krathwohl, D. R. (2001). A Taxonomy For Learning, Teaching, And Assessing : A Revision Of Bloom’s Taxonomy Of Educational Objectives. Longman.
Anderson, L. W., Krathwohl, D. R., Airasian, P. W., Cruikshank, K. A., Mayer, R. E., Pintrich, P. R.,Wittrock, M. C. (2000). A Taxonomy For Learning, Teaching, And Assessing: A Revision Of Bloom’s Taxonomy Of Educational Objectives.New York Longman, V(4), 302.
Andrei, G. (2016). Ontology And Taxonomies For Elearning.VII(5), 62–75.
Ari, A. (2011). Finding Acceptance of Bloom’s Revised Cognitive Taxonomy on the International Stage and in Turkey. Educational Sciences: Theory and Practice.
Beetham, H., & Sharpe, R. (2013). Rethinking Pedagogy for a Digital Age : Designing for 21st Century Learning.Taylor and Francis.Bekdemir, M., & Selim, Y. (2008). Revised Bloom Taxonomy And Its Apllication In Algebra Area. Journal of Education Facult.,10(2), 185–196.
Bloom, B. S. (Benjamin S., Krathwohl, D. R., & Masia, B. B. (1956). Taxonomy Of Educational Objectives : The Classification Of Educational Goals.
D. McKay.Bloom,B. S., & Abdullah Junus. (1989). Taksonomi Objektif Pendidikan : Buku Pedoman 1: Domain Kognitif. Dewan Bahasa Dan Pustaka.
Brenda Sugrue, C. (2002). Problems With Bloom’s Taxonomy. Performance Express, 3.
Danial ZainalAbidin. (2005). Tip-tip Cemerlang Daripada Quran. al-Haq.
Dixon, C. S., Wright, V. H., Co-chair, C., Wilson, E. K., Co-chair, C., Rice, M., Matherson, L. (2015). A Case Study Of One Middle School Labeled Failing :Perceptions Of The Impact Of Strategic.
Furst, E. J. (1981). Bloom’s Taxonomy of Educational Objectives for the Cognitive Domain: Philosophical and Educational Issues. Review of Educational Research Winter, 51(4), 441–453.
Gueguen, M. (2016). A Measure Of Middle School Students’ Ability To Think Critically When Exposed To Historical Thinking Pedagogy.Loyola University Chicago.
Hashim, A., Tamuri, A. H., & Jemali, M. (2013). Latar Belakang Guru Tahfiz Dan Amalan Kaedah Pengajaran Tahfiz Al-Quran Di Malaysia.
Hess, K. K. |Jones.B. S. |Carlock. D. J. R. (2009). Cognitive Rigor: Blending the Strengths of Bloom’s Taxonomy and Webb’s Depth of Knowledge to Enhance Classroom-Level Processes.
Jerald, C. (2009). Defining A 21st Century Education. Center for Public Education, (July), 82.
Kang, S. C. (2013). Malaysia Ranks 52 Out Of 65 Countries In International Assessment Programme-Nation| The Star Online.
Krathwohl, D. R. (2002). A Revision of Blooms Taxonomy : An Overview. Theory Into Practice, 41(4), 212–218.
Labib Baidun. (2014). Al-I’jazul Ilmi fil Quran. Muassasat al-Ilmi lilMatbu’at Beirut Lubnan.
Long, N., Idris, R., & Malim, T. (2015). Analisis Taksonomi Bloom Dalam Penilaian Vokasional: Cadangan Satu Taksonomi Baru.
López Martínez, A., Candel Torres, I., & Zodieru, A. (2015). Development Of New Capacities For Research And Teach/Learn Tools In Higher Education, Using The New Financing Funds In Romania. EduLearn15 Proceedings, 3674–3682.
Marzano, R. J., & Kendall, J. S. (2007). The New Taxonomy Of Educational Objectives. Corwin Press
.Meidasari, V.E., Suseno, I., & Kosasih, A. (2014). Kualitas Kognitif Dalam Integrasi Taksonomi Bloom dan Taksonomi Solo. Prosiding SNaPP: Sosial, Ekonomi, Dan Humaniora, 4(1), 351–358.
Michael, H. J. (1984). The Relationship Between Bloom’ s Taxonomy and Critical Thinking Skills. University Microfilms International.
Mike, G. &. (2013). Classroom Practice Still Blooming After Almost 60 Years : News.
Munzenmaier, C., & Rubin, N. (2013). Bloom’s Taxonomy: What’s Old Is New Again.
Pandora, D. B. (2014). Teachers’ Beliefs and Practices Regarding Homework: An Examination of the Cognitive Domain.Embedded in Third Grade Mathematics Homework. The University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee.
Pashapour, A. (2016). Critical Pedagogy, Rituals Of Distinction, and True. I-manager’s Journal of Educational Technology.Vol. No.1. April -June 2016
Paul, B. R., & Elder, L. (2006). The Miniature Guide to Critical Thinking: Concepts & Tools.
Richard W. Morshead. (1964). Taxonomy of educational objectives: Handbook II: Affective domain.Seddon, G. M. 1978. The Properties of Bloom’s Taxonomy of Educational Objectives for the Cognitive Domain. Review of Educational Research, 48(2), 303–323.
Waterman, S. (2015). Engaging At-Risk Youth Through Bloom's Taxonomy, Socratic Seminars, and Culturally Responsive Pedagogy. Empire State College State University of New York.
Ziyad Khalil Muhammad Daghamin (2005). The Method of the Qur'an in Forming the Human Thinking.Faculty of Islamic and Law Studies, al-Bait University Jordan.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Copyright (c) 2018 Nursyahirah Wahidah Masrom, Mahyuddin Hashim, Noorhayati Hashim, Fariza Puteh Behak
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
All articles are published by USIM Press. If the article is accepted for publication, the copyright of this article will be vested to author(s) and granted the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) license, unless otherwise stated. Anyone may reproduce, distribute, translate and create derivative works of this article (for both commercial and non-commercial purposes), subject to full attribution to the original publication and authors. The full terms of this licence may be seen at http://creativecommons.org/licences/by/4.0/legalcode
